The nuclear bomb drop on japan was justified if you consider what the japanese did to asia and what it would have taken them to withdraw from rest of asia unlike the germans who have accepted the holocaust now, the japanese don't even apologize and still celebrate their war criminals. The survey makes the following damning conclusion about the necessity of dropping the the atomic bombs and invading japan: “nevertheless, it seems clear that, even without the atomic bombing attacks, air supremacy over japan could have exerted sufficient pressure to bring about unconditional surrender and obviate the need for invasion . Japan already had scientists working on building the atomic bomb if we didn't drop it, they would have and if they surrendered before they made the bomb, then the war would have already killed more people than the little boy and fat man. Was the us justified in dropping atomic bombs on hiroshima and nagasaki should the atomic bomb have been dropped on japan bombing hiroshima and nagasaki: is it morally right to use atomic bombs.
Was america justified in dropping the atomic bomb on japan the dropping of the atomic bomb on japan ended world war two the decision to do so was solely that of the commander in chief of the armed forces, harry s truman. The usage of atomic bomb in japan might seem wrong today, but it was the best option during the war the united states was justified in using the atomic bombs against japan in world war ii some may feel that the united states was justified in using atomic bombs against japan. I think the allies could have pressured japan to end the war by demonstrating the power of the atomic bomb, by dropping the bomb not on a city but somewhere else.
The atomic bombs that were dropped started a very controversial issue on whether or not america’s dropping the bomb was the right thing to do to end the war with japan some people are under the belief that harry truman’s decision to drop the atomic bombs on. Published: mon, 5 dec 2016 on 6 august 1945, the first atomic bomb to be dropped on foreign soil was released from enola gay on hiroshima, japan this nuclear bomb, named little boy was dropped as a devastating attack in an attempt to make japan surrender, and destroyed hiroshima as over 70,000 people were instantly killed. Best answer: generally, arguments that question the moral justification of using atomic bombs have suggested that japan was doomed and would have surrendered shortly the suggestion has also been made that the atomic bomb should have been used as a demonstration, that it be dropped offshore and away from japan.
Justification on dropping atomic bomb like who were the bombarders that dropped the atomic bombs on japan what was a justification to use the atomic bomb against japan. Was the us justified in dropping atomic bombs on hiroshima and nagasaki the decision by the united states to drop atomic bombs on hiroshima and nagasaki at the end of world war ii remains one of the most controversial topics in japanese history. Washington, aug 6 -- the white house and war department announced today that an atomic bomb, possessing more power than 20,000 tons of tnt, a destructive force equal to the load of 2,000 b-29's and more than 2,000 times the blast power of what previously was the world's most devastating bomb, had been dropped on japan. The united states dropped two atomic bombs—nicknamed fat man and little boy—on japan in august 1945, resulting in the deaths and injury of more than 200,000 people was that action justified to bring the war to an end. Was dropping the atomic bomb on hiroshima and nagasaki justified yes no the decision to drop the atomic bomb was justified because it ended the world war faster it gave a devastating end to the war because at the time, germany and most of the axis already surrendered it was only japan who was .
The decision to drop the bomb find short, descriptive links to many of the important documents surrounding the decision to use the atomic bomb on japan here the . On 30 june 2007, japan's defense minister fumio kyūma said the dropping of atomic bombs on japan by the united states during world war ii was an inevitable way to end the war kyūma said: i now have come to accept in my mind that in order to end the war, it could not be helped ( shikata ga nai ) that an atomic bomb was dropped on nagasaki . Was america justified in dropping the atomic bomb on japan their were many civilians killed in the bombing, but it also ended the war much quicker. That bomb — and a second atomic blast on nagasaki on aug 9 — effectively ended world war ii japan surrendered six days after the hiroshima bombing the bombings were justified had .
- the atomic bomb controversy august 6, 1945- the atomic bomb was first used in combat as it was dropped on hiroshima, japan the raw explosive power of the weapon was displayed within a few days, another bomb was dropped on nagasaki, japan. In the case of americans, reference is usually made to the atomic bombing of japan in august 1945, and it is sometimes suggested that japan was selected as a target for the atomic bomb only because the japanese are asian. America’s justification for the use of the atomic bomb on august 6th, 1945, the united states of america dropped the world’s first atomic bomb on the city of hiroshima in japan.
Were the americans justified in dropping the atomic bombs on hiroshima and nagasaki in august 1945 the dropping of the atomic bomb on nagasaki and hiroshima in 1945 by the americans is a very controversial issue with no definite answer. For years debate has raged over whether the us was right to drop two atomic bombs on japan during the final weeks of the second world war the first bomb, dropped on the city of hiroshima on 6 august 1945, resulted in a death toll of around 135,000. At the time that the first bomb was dropped, japan was the only axis power remaining since germany had surrendered several months earlier however, japan sustained the bombing of hiroshima and its leader, emperor hirohito, refused to surrender.